<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Julian Revheim Askeland &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raskeland.net/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raskeland.net</link>
	<description>In English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:29:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dear Spotify</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2010/03/dear-spotify/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2010/03/dear-spotify/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Folders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playlists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotify]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raskeland.net/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear spotify.
You are delivering a fantastic service, and I&#8217;m a really happy Premium user, there is not much missing from your service except a few artists, but we all know your working on that to give us the best service available, but there is one thing i miss, that i think you easily can implement in the software, and that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear spotify.</p>
<p>You are delivering a fantastic service, and I&#8217;m a really happy Premium user, there is not much missing from your service except a few artists, but we all know your working on that to give us the best service available, but there is one thing i miss, that i think you easily can implement in the software, and that is a better way to organize playlist.  I don&#8217;t mean anything fancy, at least no yet. But can&#8217;t you please implement the opportunity to sort our playlist into folders?</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Julian</p>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=121&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2010/03/dear-spotify/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I just got F-Secure Client Security 9.0 Release Candidate</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2009/11/i-just-got-f-secure-client-security-9-0-release-candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2009/11/i-just-got-f-secure-client-security-9-0-release-candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-Secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Release Candidate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raskeland.net/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just received the Release Candidate for F-Secure Client Secutiry 9.0 and I&#8217;m installing it as i write.
The first thing i noticed is that I no longer can copy/paste the complete license key, but have to copy/paste one and one group of characters into the install wizard. I liked it better the old way.
Looking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just received the Release Candidate for F-Secure Client Secutiry 9.0 and I&#8217;m installing it as i write.</p>
<p>The first thing i noticed is that I no longer can copy/paste the complete license key, but have to copy/paste one and one group of characters into the install wizard. I liked it better the old way.</p>
<p>Looking forward to see if there is some big changes, I was after all already very happy whit the BETA version <img src='http://raskeland.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=105&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2009/11/i-just-got-f-secure-client-security-9-0-release-candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft DHCP server needs an update</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2009/11/microsoft-dhcp-server-needs-an-update/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2009/11/microsoft-dhcp-server-needs-an-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raskeland.net/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have worked quite a bit with Microsoft Server the past weeks, mostly Server 2008 and the thing I wondering is, while Active Directory, DNS and a lot of others services run smoothly together in the network the DHCP server is very individual.

You can not administer all DHCP scopes from one sentral server and replicate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have worked quite a bit with Microsoft Server the past weeks, mostly Server 2008 and the thing I wondering is, while Active Directory, DNS and a lot of others services run smoothly together in the network the DHCP server is very individual.</p>
<ul>
<li>You can not administer all DHCP scopes from one sentral server and replicate it out to your different sites.</li>
<li>You can not have to replicated DHCP servers in the same scope for fail-over.</li>
</ul>
<p>This is basics in all the others Microsoft Servers services, I miss this, it would make networks so much easier to administer.</p>
<p><strong>So way not?</strong></p>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=90&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2009/11/microsoft-dhcp-server-needs-an-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m waveing</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2009/10/im-waveing/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2009/10/im-waveing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raskeland.net/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today i got my Google Wave invite and i realy look forward to test this out.
At first glance it seems relay cool! So now i only need some friends whit Wave to communicate with  
I&#8217;ll keep you posted!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today i got my Google Wave invite and i realy look forward to test this out.</p>
<p>At first glance it seems relay cool! So now i only need some friends whit Wave to communicate with <img src='http://raskeland.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep you posted!</p>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=80&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2009/10/im-waveing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, my bad</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/sorry-my-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/sorry-my-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-Secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my mistake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raskeland.net/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After i posted &#8220;F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA – File sharing error – Solution&#8221; yesterday I kept looking for a reason way this error appeared in F-Secure, It just didn&#8217;t look right for F-Secure to have such mistakes even in a BETA software.
I found a article at Microsoft: &#8220;Internet firewalls can prevent browsing and file [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After i posted &#8220;<a rel="bookmark" href="../2009/09/f-secure-client-security-9-0-beta-file-sharing-error-solution/">F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA – File sharing error – Solution</a>&#8221; yesterday I kept looking for a reason way this error appeared in F-Secure, It just didn&#8217;t look right for F-Secure to have such mistakes even in a BETA software.</p>
<p>I found a article at Microsoft: &#8220;<a title="Internet firewalls can prevent browsing and file sharing" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/298804/" target="_blank">Internet firewalls can prevent browsing and file sharing</a>&#8221; and there i found all the ports that where used for file sharing:</p>
<ul>
<li>Microsoft file sharing SMB: User Datagram Protocol (UDP) ports from 135 through 139 and Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) ports from 135 through 139.</li>
<li>Direct-hosted SMB traffic without a network basic input/output system (NetBIOS): port 445 (TCP and UPD).</li>
</ul>
<p>And after reading that i started looking at the F-Secure Firewall services again and found two services. &#8220;SMB over TCP/IP (TCP)&#8221; and &#8220;SMB over TCP/IP (UDP)&#8221; witch in fact does the same as i did yesterday by opening port 445.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m sorry to have blamed F-Secure before checking better but after finding the &#8220;Windows file sharing and network printers&#8221; service i just didn&#8217;t think about looking for an SMB service, sorry, my bad.</p>
<p>On the other side, i think that thees services should have another name because a normal user probably don&#8217;t know what SMB is, but might still want to share files. So a tips to -F-Secure this time is to give this services a better name.</p>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=61&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/sorry-my-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA &#8211; File sharing error &#8211; Solution</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/f-secure-client-security-9-0-beta-file-sharing-error-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/f-secure-client-security-9-0-beta-file-sharing-error-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BETA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-Secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raskeland.net/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have found the problem and the solution to my file sharing problem..
The F-Secure service named &#8220;Windows file sharing and network printers&#8221; only open TCP port 139 while Windows file sharing wants to use TCP port 445. So I created a new service for port 445 and added it to the rule and then file [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found the problem and the solution to my file sharing problem..</p>
<p>The F-Secure service named &#8220;Windows file sharing and network printers&#8221; only open TCP port 139 while Windows file sharing wants to use TCP port 445. So I created a new service for port 445 and added it to the rule and then file sharing worked fine&#8230;</p>
<p>I think TCP port 445 should be added to the &#8220;Windows file sharing and network printers&#8221; service.</p>
<p><em><strong>Update:</strong></em></p>
<p>I was wrong. <a title="Sorry, my bad" href="http://www.raskeland.net/2009/09/sorry-my-bad/" target="_blank">Sorry, my bad</a>.</p>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=57&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/f-secure-client-security-9-0-beta-file-sharing-error-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-Secure Client Security &#8211; Office firewall profile</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/f-secure-client-security-office-firewall-profile/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/f-secure-client-security-office-firewall-profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BETA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-Secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profiles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raskeland.net/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may have noticed i have problems with windows sharing while running the new F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA.
I have tested with different profiles and it has not worked on any of them. But a few days ago i noticed that if i use the office firewall profile I&#8217;m not able to open for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may have noticed i have problems with windows sharing while running the new F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA.</p>
<p>I have tested with different profiles and it has not worked on any of them. But a few days ago i noticed that if i use the office firewall profile I&#8217;m not able to open for file sharing because it&#8217;s denied in a later rule by default, and that&#8217;s a rule I cannot change. So if I allow file sharing in a rule i create myself, it will just be denied by the default rule afterwords.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t I be able to choose for myself if I want to share my files in an office environment? I want to be able to change that rule, or even remove it&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=53&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/f-secure-client-security-office-firewall-profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My testlab</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/my-testlab/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/my-testlab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-Secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testlab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raskeland.net/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past weeks i have tested the new F-secure Clients Security 9.0 BETA. And for that reason i have now set up a new testlab for this and other tests.
My new testlab is a HP ProLiant ML110 with Windows Server 2008 x64
On this server I run the Hyper-V service, and on top of the Hyper-V [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The past weeks i have tested the new F-secure Clients Security 9.0 BETA. And for that reason i have now set up a new testlab for this and other tests.</p>
<p>My new testlab is a HP ProLiant ML110 with Windows Server 2008 x64</p>
<p>On this server I run the Hyper-V service, and on top of the Hyper-V I have the following clients:</p>
<ul>
<li>Windows Vista enterprise x64</li>
<li>Windows Vista enterprise x86</li>
<li>Windows 7 professional x64</li>
<li>Windows 7 professional x86</li>
<li>Windows XP professional x86</li>
</ul>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=48&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2009/09/my-testlab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Correction &#8211; Firewall issue</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2009/08/correction-firewall-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2009/08/correction-firewall-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BETA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-Secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raskeland.net/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an correction to my previous post &#8220;F-Secure Client Security &#8211; Firewall issue&#8220;!
I just found out that the File sharing rule don&#8217;t work at all. I previously stated i use F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA on a Windows 7 x64 RTM client.
The RDP Rule is still working, and i have created a new rule [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an correction to my previous post &#8220;<a title="F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA – Firewall issue" href="http://www.raskeland.net/2009/08/f-secure-client-security-9-0-beta-firewall-issue/" target="_blank">F-Secure Client Security &#8211; Firewall issue</a>&#8220;!</p>
<p>I just found out that the File sharing rule don&#8217;t work at all. I previously stated i use F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA on a Windows 7 x64 RTM client.</p>
<p>The RDP Rule is still working, and i have created a new rule for a random port to test and that worked to.<br />
So it&#8217;s just the file sharing rule for Windows File sharing that don&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>How i created the rule:</p>
<ul>
<li>Add new rule</li>
<li>Name: &#8220;File sharing&#8221;</li>
<li>Allow</li>
<li>All IP addresses</li>
<li>Service: &#8220;Windows file sharing and network printers&#8221;</li>
<li>Both ways</li>
<li>No alert</li>
<li>Finish</li>
</ul>
<p>Can there be something wrong with the &#8220;Windows file sharing and network printers&#8221; service?</p>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=34&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2009/08/correction-firewall-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA &#8211; Firewall issue</title>
		<link>http://raskeland.net/2009/08/f-secure-client-security-9-0-beta-firewall-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://raskeland.net/2009/08/f-secure-client-security-9-0-beta-firewall-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BETA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-Secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raskeland.net/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have for the last weeks tested the F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA. I have only tested it on Windows 7 x64 systems but it seems to work great!
Until now i have only experienced one little problem whit the Firewall.
I was going to open for RDP (Remote desktop protocol), and Windows file sharing. Created one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have for the last weeks tested the F-Secure Client Security 9.0 BETA. I have only tested it on Windows 7 x64 systems but it seems to work great!</p>
<p>Until now i have only experienced one little problem whit the Firewall.<br />
I was going to open for RDP (Remote desktop protocol), and Windows file sharing. Created one rule for the RDP and it worked fine, and then I created the file sharing rule and nothing happens. Waited for about 10 minutes, and still nothing. So i had to reboot my system to get the the rule to work. I guess it&#8217;s not suppose to be that way.</p>
<p>I have only tested this on one client yet, but i will do some more testing during the week!</p>
<p><strong><em>Update:</em></strong><br />
Please read the post &#8220;<a title="Correction – Firewall issue" href="http://www.raskeland.net/2009/08/correction-firewall-issue/" target="_blank">Correction &#8211; Firewall issue</a>&#8220;<strong></strong></p>
<img src="http://raskeland.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=30&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raskeland.net/2009/08/f-secure-client-security-9-0-beta-firewall-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
